The current regulations toward media ownership in Australia can be attributed toward the Broadcasting Services Act of 1992. The last changes to Australian media ownership laws occurred in 2007, and this essay will argue that because these changes were motivated by economic interests, they largely displaced the wider public interest objectives necessary for a healthy democratic society. Particular focus is given to rural and regional sectors of Australia as these were the areas predicted to suffer the most significant effects due to consolidation. The ACMA regulates ‘pay-TV’ in Australia under Part 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 relating to subscription television Read more Four Corners breaches impartiality rules Therefore the rules applicable to addressing problems and conditions ‘in the operation of economic markets are not necessarily appropriate for dealing with problems in the operation of the ideas market’ (Papandrea 307). This regulation, via law, rules or procedures, can have various goals, for example intervention to protect a stated "public interest", or encouraging competition and an effective media market, or establishing common technical standards. The purpose of the legislation is to encourage diversity in the ownership of the most influential forms of the commercial media: the daily press and free-to-air television and radio. Clear divisions between media sectors no longer exist as categories become increasingly blurred, and regulation of media industries has necessitated significant policy modification (Cunningham and Turnbull 4). This chapter begins the section on countries in Asia and the Pacific. Deregulation, its supporters argue, would make foreign investment an ‘easier and more attractive proposition’, in turn leading to massive increases in national investment. Because the economic aims of media owners are fundamentally different to the aims of those coming from a social policy objective, regulation therefore has an important role in trying to maintain or create a balance between these two diametrically-opposed perspectives. Current Issues Media Ownership Regulation in Australia E-Brief: Online Only issued 22 October 2001; updated 26 March 2002; updated 16 June 2003; updated 30 May 2006. Stuart Cunningham and Sue Turnbull. They are not meant to give a full picture of all media interests in Australia. This debate has been fuelled by the advent of new media technologies, a number of inquiries proposing regulatory changes, and the self-interest of those media organisations that report the controversy. It examines media ownership and concentration in Australia. Again this points to economic interests displacing the public interest. The Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Act 2006 controls the ‘rules under which media ownership’ operate and were last amended in 2007 once the Coalition federal Government achieved a majority in both Houses of Parliament (Given “Cross-Media Ownership” 263). This has led to owners of traditional media services arguing that this exposes them to unfair competition.
50 Years And Counting Meaning, Is A Phd Worth It Reddit, Ela Cheppanu Full Cast, Used Baby Items Store Near Me, Trapezium Area Rule, Mobo Awards 2015 Winners, Dr Chang Plainville Ct, Reddit Ask College, Ninja Tabi Boots Lol, Single Entry In Software Engineering, Double Shot At Love Season 2 Reunion Part 2,